Baptism B: Re-Creation

 

 

 

Jordan River, Israel
Jordan River, Israel

OLD TESTAMENT: Genesis 1: 1-5

To read the Old Testament Lectionary passage, click here

What an appropriate Scriptures for today on this first time that we’ve met in this new year! Genesis is a book about beginnings—the beginnings of the universe, the beginnings of humankind, the beginnings of the people of Israel, the beginnings of a family. Theodore Hiebert says this about Genesis:

 Genesis shares the scientist’s fascination with the birth of the cosmos and the origin of life on earth, the anthropologists’ curiosity about the first human beings, the historian’s interest in the beginning of civilization, a family’s esteem for their earliest ancestors, and the theologian’s concern about the founding events of religious traditions.” (Theodore Hiebert, The New Interpreter’s Study Bible, 1)

 The opening part of Genesis is essentially an affirmation of faith in the God who created the world and all that exists that comes to us in self-revelation. We usually read this as a poetic rendering of the beginning of Creation. But it’s interesting to look a little more closely and realize that the first sentence stands alone. The “beginning” of time refers not to the beginning of Creation but rather to the ordering of Creation. According to this passage, the earth was there, dark and formless nothing though it was. So time begins with God’s ordering of things and the “seven-day” cycle represents a temporal pattern that is often repeated, representing a completeness. So this account of creation is not the “beginning”, per se, because God was not starting with nothing.

The “wind from God” is commonly equated with what we would call Elohim, the Spirit of God. God was present even in the nothingness, even before the “beginning”. The idea of God speaking Creation into being is powerful. Then God said…so Creation is not an accident, but a purposeful movement by an already present and powerful deity. Here, the light is not the sun. It, obviously had not been created yet in the grand scheme of things. This light is, rather, a creative force that pushed back the darkness. In essence, then, every morning is an act of Creation. And then God evaluates the creative process, proclaiming it good. “Good” does not mean perfect or static or in no need of development. It means that God did what God intended—began the ordering of life.

Well, obviously this is only part of the whole Creation narrative to which we are accustomed to reading. But we get the idea! This is not a God who kicked the whole thing off and then left us to our own devices. Creation is ongoing. This passage is the beginning of that ordering. It continues…through suns and moons, and plants, and animals, and us. God creates times and space and rest for the weary. God continually gives us ways to connect with God—waters that roar, bushes that burn, prophets that proclaim, poets that sing, and sages that pray. And just when we thought we had God all figured out, God comes, not as a king or a leader, but as a helpless child born into poverty in the midst of destruction and social unrest. And over and over and over again, God recreates. It’s not about what happened 4.5 billion years ago or 8,000 years ago, depending on who you believe. It’s about Creation—over and over and over again. It’s about God, Emmanuel, God With Us, speaking us and all that surrounds us into being—over and over and over again. And it is very, very good.

 

  1. What is your response to this passage?
  2. Are there some new ways of looking at this?
  3. How does it change the story of this is truly looked upon as the beginning of Creation rather than the historical narrative of it?
  4. What does it mean to you to say that this passage is an affirmation of faith?

 

 NEW TESTAMENT: Acts 19: 1-7

To read the New Testament Lectionary passage, click here

This exchange seems to be directed at some of John the Baptist’s former disciples, rather than the “Disciples” of Jesus. Their confusion over their baptism as one that was “into John’s baptism” probably implied for them that they had not yet received the Holy Spirit. They had been claimed for repentance and for following John but not claimed for what came after that. Essentially, they had missed the point.

Keep in mind that all through the Book of Acts, these new believers are sort of in “transition”. They knew they had something but they didn’t know what it was or what to do with it. But once it was clarified that this baptism was in the name of Jesus, rather than John’s, they understood. The Holy Spirit came upon them, according to the passage.

This, though, does not presume a formal relationship between Baptism and the reception of the Holy Spirit. The liturgy is not a magical potion but, rather, a proclamation of what God has done and what God is doing. Baptism is more than about individual experiences. It is, rather, an extension of what God is doing in the world.

It is interesting here, too, that apparently the early church-goers had just as many diverse views of Baptism as we do—WHEN should we baptize? HOW should we baptize? WHY should we baptize? What should we say when we baptize? How much water should we use when we baptize? How many times should we baptize? WHO should be baptized? Good grief, is that what it’s about? Maybe instead of getting bogged down in the specifics, we should just celebrate. Baptism is about God. It is about God coming into one’s life, whatever that may look like. And it is about us as a people acknowledging that each and every one of us is a beloved child of God. Baptism is to be celebrated and remembered. It is about us in God. It is about knowing that there is something bigger than we are. It is about newness in life. Baptism happens once. But it is at work day after day after day in our life, recreating us, making us new. So remember your baptism and be thankful.

 

  1. What meaning does this passage hold for you?
  2. Does this change how you view Baptism in any way?
  3. How do you think most people today view Baptism?

 

FOR FURTHER READING:

The new young pastor of Lake Bluff Christian Church had seen the man on the streets of the town frequently. In the first busy weeks of his new pastorate, he hadn’t taken the time to inquire about him. But when he discovered that the man sat quietly on the steps outside the church every Sunday, listening, he was determined to find out about him. “Oh, that’s Rocky Dumar,” the secretary replied when he inquired on Monday morning. “His mother is a member, but she hasn’t come to church for many years. She’s a shut-in now. Rocky just likes to listen to the music.” “But why doesn’t he come inside?” the pastor asked. “I don’t know. I’ve been here for ten years and I’ve never seen him ‘in’ a worship service. Why don’t you ask him?”

The next Sunday, as he took his place at the rear of the sanctuary, waiting to process behind the choir, the pastor peeked out the door. There, on the top step, sat Rocky Dumar. “Good morning, Rocky,” the pastor said. There was no surprise on the round face that turned toward him, just a smile. His narrow blue eyes and slightly protruding tongue indicated Down’s Syndrome. “Good morning,” Rocky answered softly. “Why don’t you come inside and join us for the service?” He shook his head. “I can’t come in. I’m not baptized.” Although the pastor was surprised and puzzled by Rocky’s response, the opening chords of the processional hymn signaled an end to their conversation for the moment. “Well, you’re welcome to come in any time, Rocky. I’m glad you’re here,” the pastor said, and turned to enter the service.

It was more than a week before the busy work of settling in allowed the pastor to pursue the puzzle of Rocky Dumar’s reluctance to enter the church. “That’s an old, long story,” the chair of the parish board said when she was questioned on the subject. “When Rocky was about twelve or thirteen his mother wanted him to be baptized and confirmed, like the other youngsters. There were a lot of strange ideas back then about retarded people. His parents hadn’t even tried to have Rocky baptized as a baby, but when she saw how well he turned out, and how much he loved the church services, his mother wanted him to become a member. The pastor and the elders back then refused, saying Rocky could attend the class and be baptized, but he wasn’t ever going to understand enough to become a member. They wouldn’t allow him to come into a position where he could vote and take communion. Of course, back then women couldn’t vote, either! Rocky is two or three years older than me, so this was a ways back. My mother would never have dreamed that I would someday be parish board chair! But there are some here who would still hold onto those old ideas in regard to Rocky.” “What about his mother?” “Oh, she retained her membership, but she and Rocky stopped coming to worship. She’s pretty crippled up with arthritis now, and doesn’t get out of the house much, but it was protest over Rocky’s not being confirmed that made her stay away. She never let him be baptized, either. That must be where he got the idea that that was why he couldn’t come into the church anymore. But Rocky always loved the music. He’s come almost every Sunday, all these years. He wears his good bib overalls and sits on the steps to listen to the service, even in winter. But after they refused to confirm him, he’s never come in.”

The young pastor did a lot more visiting with people on the subject of Rocky. Although he was careful to work it in casually in other conversations, so as not to make it a big deal, rumor began to spread that something was up. Those who disapproved made it known in their subtle ways, but he began to form a plan on how to get Rocky Dumar inside the church. The most vital information came from Rocky’s mother and Rocky himself.

By spring, just before confirmation time, and after a lot of prayer, the pastor knew what to do. Many of the older members of the church were surprised when Ella Dumar made her way slowly across the front of the sanctuary from the side door on Confirmation Sunday. An usher helped her into the front pew with the confirmation families. And after the confirmation class rose to stand before the congregation, the pastor looked expectantly toward the rear of the sanctuary and said, “Okay, Rocky, you can come in now.” Rocky Dumar walked down the center aisle of the sanctuary in his good bib overalls, his baseball cap in his hands. He took his place in the confirmation line, his grey hair and size sharply contrasting with the rest of the class. The pastor proceeded to question the students on their catechism, and they answered … some well, and some not so well. Rocky stood quietly, turning his cap in his hands and waiting. At last the pastor said, “One member of this new group of confirmands is long overdue for this ceremony. Rocky Dumar received his confirmation training in 1941, but he’s been brushing up this last couple of weeks with the rest of this class. Rocky needs to be baptized before he’s confirmed, and I want to ask him one question before we proceed.” The pastor motioned Rocky forward and turned him to face the congregation. “Rocky Dumar, what does baptism mean?” Although his speech was thick and a little slow, Rocky’s voice was strong and sure when he answered, “Jesus loves the little children. All the children of the world. Jesus loves Rocky Dumar, too.” Then, with his mother’s eyes shining on him in pride, Rocky Dumar was baptized and confirmed as a full member of Lake Bluff Christian Church. And all of God’s people said, “Amen.” (from Lectionary Tales for the Pulpit: 62 Stories for Cycle B, by John E. Sumwalt and Jo Perry-Sumwalt, available at http://www.sermonsuite.com/free.php?i=788016807&key=r0xspkweyawjWO3c, accessed 4 January, 2011.)

 

GOSPEL: Mark 1: 4-11

To read the Lectionary Gospel passage, click here

Once again, we encounter John the Baptist. John’s idea of baptism was one of repentance and forgiveness. What came after was to come later. The whole idea of Baptism is a call to reform, a call to change. God has already drawn near to us before we repent as acknowledged in the liturgy of Baptism. Now it is our turn to respond.

The whole idea of the Baptism of Jesus is sometimes odd. How can one who is supposed to be sinless be forgiven? Over time, some writers and theologians have found the whole idea of the baptism of Jesus preposterous and embarrassing. But the fact that Jesus was baptized only suggests that Jesus associated himself with the need to gather God’s people and to prepare for the Lord’s coming with a gesture of repentance, an entrusting of oneself wholly and completely to God. It also reminds us that Baptism is not about us. We cannot baptize ourselves. It is about God’s presence in our life.

Only in the Gospel of Mark do we hear of the “heavens being torn apart”—not opened as in Matthew and Luke—but torn apart. The Greek word for this means “schism” (which, interestingly enough, is similar to chaos). It’s not the same as the word open. You open a door; you close a door; the door still looks the same. But torn—the ragged edges never go back in quite the same way again. At this point of Jesus’ baptism, God’s Spirit becomes present on earth in a new way. A new ordering of Creation has begun. The heavens have torn apart. They cannot go back. Nothing will ever be the same. Everything that we have known, everything that we have thought has been torn apart and that is the place where God comes through. And the heavens can never again close as tightly as before.

This story of Jesus’ Baptism calls us to remember our own. It, too, is our beginning as the gift of God’s grace washes away those things that impede our relationship with God and gives us new birth, new life. And it calls us to do something with our life.

But I actually don’t remember the day of my baptism. It happened when I was a little over seven months old, on Palm Sunday, April 15, 1962. It was at First United Methodist Church, Brookshire, TX and Rev. Bert Condrey was the officiant. I had a special dress and lots of family present. That would be all I really know.

And yet we are reminded to “remember our baptism”. What does that mean for those of us who don’t? I think “remembering” is something bigger than a chronological recount of our own memories. It is bigger than remembering what we wore or where we stood or who the actual person was that touched our head with or even immersed us in water. It means remembering our very identity, our creation, what it is that made us, that collective memory that is part of our tradition, our liturgy, our family.

That is what “remembering” our baptism is. It’s not just remembering the moment that we felt that baptismal stream; it is remembering the story into which we entered. It is at that point that the Christian family became our own as we began to become who God intends us to be. And for each of us, whether or not we noticed it, the heavens tore apart, spilled out, and the Holy Spirit emerged. And we, too, were conferred with a title. “This is my child, my daughter or son, my beloved, with whom I am well pleased.”

And in that moment, whether we are infants or older, we are ordained for ministry in the name of Jesus Christ. We are ordained to the work of Christ and the work of Christ’s church. Caroline Westerhoff says that “at baptism we are incorporated into Christ’s body, infused with Christ’s character, and empowered to be Christ’s presence in the world. [So then], ministry is not something in particular that we do; it is what we are about in everything we do.” (in Calling: A Song for the Baptized, by Caroline Westerhoff, p. xi) In other words, our own Baptism sweeps us into that dawn that Jesus began. And, like Jesus, our own Baptism calls us and empowers us to empty ourselves before God. As we begin to find ourselves standing in those waters with Christ, we also find ourselves ready to be followers of Christ.

You are part of something beyond yourself, beyond what you know, and beyond what you can remember. Rainer Maria Rilke once said that “the future enters into us, in order to transform itself in us, long before it happens.” Your past now reaches far back before you were here and your future is being transformed and redeemed in you even as we speak.

After he was baptized, Jesus stood, dripping wet, to enter his ministry. The heavens tore apart and poured into the earth. All of humanity was there in that moment—those gone, those to come. We now stand, wet with those same waters, as we, too, are called into ministry in the name of Christ. Then…it is up to you to finish the story. This day and every day, remember your baptism, remember that you are a daughter or son of God with whom God is well pleased and be thankful. You are now part of the story, part of this ordering of chaos, part of light emerging from darkness, part of life born from death. You are part of God’s re-creation. And it is very, very good.

 

  1. What meaning does this passage hold for you?
  2. Do we usually equate Baptism with “repentance”?
  3. What does this “tearing” mean for you? How does that relate to our own lives?
  4. What does your own baptism mean for you?
  5. What does it mean to “remember your baptism”?

 

 

Some Quotes for Further Reflection:

The desire to find God and to see God and to love God is the one thing that matters. (Thomas Merton)

 

Later, after the angels, after the stable, after the Child, they went back…as we always must, back to the world that doesn’t understand our talk of angels and stars and especially not the Child. We go back complaining that it doesn’t’ last. They went back singing praises to God! We do have to go back, but we can still sing the alleluias! (From “Later”, in Kneeling in Bethlehem, by Ann Weems, 86)

 

What we are looking for on earth and in earth and in our lives is the process that can unlock for us the mystery of meaningfulness in our daily lives. It has been the best-kept secret down through the ages because it is so simple. Truly, the last place it would ever occur to most of us to find the sacred would be in the commonplace of our everyday lives and all about us in nature and in simple things.   (Alice O. Howell, The Dove in the Stone)

 

 

Closing

 

Prayer: “Jordan”, in In Wisdom’s Path, by Jan Richardson, 36.

 

“Then Jesus came from Galilee to John at the Jordan, to be baptized by him. John would have prevented him, saying, “I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?” But Jesus answered him, “Let it be so for now, for it is proper for us in this way to fulfill all righteousness.” Then he consented. And when Jesus had been baptized, just as he came up from the water, suddenly the heavens were opened to him and he saw the spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting on him. And a voice from heaven said, “This is my Son, the Beloved, with whom I am well pleased.”

 

More than once today I have thrown down my notebook, my pen, and finally myself onto this bed. Jordan springs from either eye, and it may look like I am weeping from this wrestling, but really I am standing at the water, looking for the one who will pull me under and holler out my name.

 

 

Advent 4B: The Edge of Heaven

 

 

 

 

The Cestello Annunciation, Sandro Botticelli (1489-1490)
The Cestello Annunciation, Sandro Botticelli (1489-1490)

OLD TESTAMENT: 2 Samuel 7: 1-11, 16

To read the Old Testament Lectionary passage, click here

This text wraps up the promise that God made to Abram in Genesis 12. The people have a land that they can claim as their own and they can live in peace. 2 Samuel pretty much tracks the rise to power of King David. This chapter represents sort of the “legitimization” of David’s rule. Up until now, David has been anointed king of Israel, has consolidated power in Jerusalem, and has brought the ark of the Lord to rest in a tent in Jerusalem. Things seem to be going well. And so David envisions now a more permanent structure to house the ark of the Lord. In other words, David now desires to build a temple in Jerusalem.

But that night the Lord intervenes by way of Nathan with a promise not necessarily of a permanent “house” but, rather a permanent dynasty, an everlasting house of the line of David. David has risen from shepherd boy to king and has apparently felt God’s presence through it all. He now sits in his comfortable palace and compares his “house” to the tent that “houses God” in his mind. So he decides that God needs a grand house too. God, through the prophet Nathan responds by asking, in a sense, “Hey! Did you hear me complaining about living in a tent? No, I prefer being mobile, flexible, responsive, free to move about, not fixed in one place.” God then turns the tables on David and says, “You think you’re going to build me a house? No, no, no, no. I’M going to build YOU a house. A house that will last much longer and be much greater than anything you could build yourself with wood and stone. A house that will shelter the hopes and dreams of your people long after ‘you lie down with your ancestors.'” God promises to establish David and his line “forever,” and this is a “no matter what” promise, even if the descendants of David sin, even if “evildoers” threaten. (The Davidic Covenant).

Walter Brueggemann identifies this Scripture as “the dramatic and theological center of the entire Samuel text.” But this also would represent a major upheaval to the way that the people understood God. The permanent temple structure would no longer represent a God who traveled with the people but rather a God who expected the people to come to God.

The truth is, we all desire permanence; we want something on which we can stand, that we can touch, that we can “sink our teeth into”, so to speak. We want to know the plan so that we can plan around it. Well, if this was going to make it easier to understand God, go ahead. The truth is, this is a wandering God of wandering people. This is not a God who desires or can be shut up in a temple or a church or a closed mind. This God is palatial; this God is unlimited; this God will show up in places that we did not build. (and sometimes in places that we really wouldn’t go!) This God does not live in a house; this God dwells with us—wherever we are. This God comes as a traveler, a journeyer, a moveable feast. And this God shows up where we least expect God to be—in a god-forsaken place on the outskirts of acceptable society to a couple of people that had other plans for their lives. This God will be where God will be. And it IS a permanent home.

 

  1. What is your response to this passage?
  2. Are there places that you sense God’s presence more than other places?
  3. What does the change in this understanding of God mean for you?
  4. What does this say about our “model” of church? About our “model” of our faith journey? About our “image” of God?

 

 

NEW TESTAMENT: Romans 16: 25-27

http://bible.oremus.org/?ql=285058361

This passage at the very end of Paul’s Letter to the Romans is the doxology. It may have even contained phrases from a familiar doxology that would have been known by its first century readers. The reference to “my gospel” may sound a little odd to us, but remember that Paul was continually disputing and warning his readers of “false gospels” that did not reflect the true essence of Jesus the Christ. But Paul’s gospel is based first of all on the tradition of the Torah and the prophetic writings of the Old Testament. But now it was meant for all—Jew and Gentile alike. Paul’s gospel is rooted in a faith that is bigger than itself; it is rooted in centuries of God’s relationship with God’s people.

In this Fourth week of Advent, we read this doxology along with the imminence of Jesus’ birth. Read alongside the story of Mary as God-bearer, we have the sense that the full Gospel is starting to unfold. This is in no way a “replacement” for the Law of Moses; it is that Law seen to its fulfillment in the new humanity, the new Adam, in Jesus Christ. Gentiles have been “grafted” into a story that was already taking place. For Paul, his gospel was the “unveiling” of something that had been around from the very beginning.

Scholars think that it is quite possible that Paul did not write these verses but that they were attached to the end of the letter perhaps AS a doxology, a statement of praise and proclamation. But regardless of who wrote it, this is a statement of response. It is, to use Paul’s words, an “obedience of faith.” The Incarnation of God in Jesus Christ invokes our response; otherwise it is virtually meaningless. In Feasting on the Word, Cathy F. Young quotes Helmut Thielicke when he says, “Faith can be described only as a movement of flight, flight away from myself and toward the great possibilities of God.” The whole gospel in its fullness is about our response. It is our faith that moves it and opens up the possibilities that God envisioned.

Advent is about letting ourselves envision what God envisions. Because into this world that often seems random and meaningless, full of pain and despair; into this society that is often callous and lacking of compassion, directionless and confused; into our lives that many times are wrought with grief and a sense that it is all for naught; into all of it is born a baby that holds the hope of the world for the taking. The great illustrator and writer, Tasha Tudor said, “the gloom of the world is but a shadow. Behind it, yet within our reach, is joy. Take joy!”

This is what this doxology says: All of this that has been laid out for you, all of this that has been created; all of this that has for so long been moving toward your life, take it. Take joy! Tomorrow will be your dancing day!

 

Tomorrow shall be my dancing day; I would my true love did so chance

To see the legend of my play, to call my true love to my dance;

 

Sing, oh! My love, oh! My love, my love, my love, this have I done for my true love.

 

Then was I born of a virgin pure, of her I took fleshly substance

Thus was I knit to man’s nature, to call my true love to my dance.

 

In a manger laid, and wrapped I was, so very poor, this was my chance

Betwixt and ox and a silly poor ass, to call my true love to my dance.

Traditional English Carol

 

  1. What meaning does this passage hold for you?
  2. Why do we struggle with the notion of true, unconditional joy?
  3. What is it that stands in our way?
  4. What does this Season of Advent say about our response?
  5. What would it mean to live our lives as if tomorrow truly was our dancing day?

 

GOSPEL: Luke 1: 26-38

http://bible.oremus.org/?ql=285058461

Now we Protestants really don’t tend to give this much credence. We sort of speed through this passage we read as some sort of precursor to “In those days a decree went out from Emperor Augustus…” This, for us, is the beginning of the birth story. But think back. Something happened nine months before. This human Jesus, like all of us, had to be grown and nurtured in the womb before the miracles started. March 25th—The Feast of the Annunciation—is for some the turning point of human history. It is in this moment that God steps through the fog into humanity and, just like every human that came before, must wait to be fully birthed into this world. March 25th is traditionally regarded as the first day of Creation. December 25th falls nine months after it and is right after the winter solstice, when the days start growing longer. So, in this view, the Annunciation is the beginning (or re-beginning, if you will) of Creation and December 25th is the coming of light into the darkest night of the world.

Annunciation literally means “the announcement”. The word by itself probably holds no real mystery. But it is the beginning of the central tenet of our entire Christian faith—The Annunciation, Incarnation, Transfiguration, Resurrection. For us, it begins the mystery of Christ Jesus. For us, the fog lifts and there before is the bridge between the human and the Divine.

The first thing that strikes me is that I think when you hear an angel or some other messenger of God say “Do not be afraid”, you should be very concerned. The central figure in this passage is neither Gabriel nor Mary—it is God. This is the beginning of God coming into the world, a further unfolding of God’s design for the salvation of humanity. After the greeting, it says that Mary was greatly troubled. Well why shouldn’t be? But there is a folktale told in Tobit (in the apocrypha) that tells of a jealous angel who appeared on a bride’s wedding night each time she married and killed her bridegroom. Some think that in light of this popular tale, Mary may have at first misconstrued God’s messenger for an evil spirit threatening to prevent her marriage. So the angel reassures Mary and tells her of the staggering thing that she is being asked to do—to carry and nurture the Son of God, to birth the salvation of the world.

Well, then Mary is confused. Well, of course she is confused. But Gabriel assures that the baby would be born by the power of God. The Annunciation–literally, it marks the impregnating of a young, innocent girl by God. But whether or not we can get past the “how can that be” is not the point. Think about the mystery. Think about what that meant for that world more than 2,000 years ago. Think about what it means for our world. Think about what it means for you.

 

We all need to be told that God loves us, and the mystery of the Annunciation reveals an aspect of that love. But it also suggests that our response to love is critical. A few verses before the angel appears to Mary in the first chapter of Luke’s Gospel, another annunciation occurs; an angel announces to an old man, Zechariah, that his equally aged wife is to bear a son who will “make ready a people prepared for the Lord.” The couple are to name him John; he is know to us as John the Baptist. Zechariah says to the angel, “How will I know that this is so?” which is a radically different response from the one Mary makes. She says, “How can this be?”

I interpret this to mean that while Zechariah is seeking knowledge and information, Mary contents herself with wisdom, with pondering a state of being…

Mary’s “How can this be?” is a simpler response than Zechariah’s, and also more profound. She does not lose her voice but finds it. Like any of the prophets, she asserts herself before God, saying, “Here am I.” There is no arrogance, however, but only holy fear and wonder. Mary proceeds—as we must do in life—making her commitment without knowing much about what it will entail or where it will lead. I treasure the story because it forces me to ask: When the mystery of God’s love breaks through into my consciousness, do I run from it? Do I ask of it what it cannot answer? Shrugging, do I retreat into facile clichés, the popular but false wisdom of what “we all know”? Or am I virgin enough to respond from my deepest, truest self, and say something new, a “yes” that will change me forever? (Excerpt from Meditations on Mary, by Kathleen Norris)

 

  1. What meaning does this passage hold for you?
  2. Why do we Protestants not fully embrace the notion of the Annunciation?
  3. How does that change the meaning of God’s coming into the world if we do?
  4. How would you answer the question of whether or not you are “virgin” enough to respond to God?

 

 

PSALTER: Luke 1: 47-55

http://bible.oremus.org/?ql=285058593

We often call this passage “The Song of Mary”, depicting it as a beautiful and idyllic poem. Really? E. Stanley Jones called The Magnificat “the most revolutionary document in the world.” It turns the world on its ear. It is a call to revolution. For those who are comfortable and fed and “on top” of ordered society, it is downright dangerous.

 

  1. What meaning does this passage hold for you?

 

 

Some Quotes for Further Reflection:

If God’s incomprehensibility does not grip us in a word, if it does not draw us into [God’s] superluminous darkness, if it does not call us out of the little house of our homely close-hugged truths…we have misunderstood the words of Christianity. (Karl Rahner)

 

God did not wait till the world was ready, till nations were at peace. God came when the Heavens were unsteady and prisoners cried out for release. God did not wait for the perfect time. God came when the need was deep and great. In the mystery of the Word made flesh, the maker of the Stars was born. We cannot wait till the world is sane to raise our songs with joyful voice, or to share our grief, to touch our pain. God came with Love. Rejoice! Rejoice! And go into the Light of God. (“First Coming”, by Madeleine L’Engle)

 

God is now on earth and [humanity] in heaven; on every side all things comingle. [God] has come on earth, while being fully in heaven; and while complete in heaven, [God] is without diminution on earth…Though being the unchanging word, God become flesh to dwell amongst us. (St. John Chysostom)

 

 

Closing

 

I wonder if God comes to the edge of heaven each Advent and flings the Star into the December sky, laughing with joy as it lights the darkness of the earth; and the angels, hearing the laughter of God, begin to congregate in some celestial chamber to practice their alleluias. I wonder if there some ordering of rank among the angels as they move into procession, the seraphim bumping into the cherubim for top spot, the new inhabitants of heaven standing in the back until they get the knack of it. (After all, treading air over a stable and annunciating as the same time can’t be all that easy!)

 

Or is everybody—that is, every “soul”—free to fly wherever the spirit moves? Or do they even think about it? Perhaps when God calls, perhaps they just come, this multitude of heavenly hosts. Perhaps they come, winging through the winds of time, full of expectancy, full of hope that this year…perhaps this year…perhaps…the earth will fall to its knees in a whisper of “Peace”. (Ann Weems, Kneeling in Bethlehem, p. 39)