As we have seen, the possibility of Israel’s future survival and well-being depends on Yahweh’s promise and presence. We are given two speeches by Moses. They follow the story of the golden calf both in our lectionary and in the Scriptures themselves. Remember that at the end of that passage, we hear that God has had a change of mind. Now that is a surprising if not powerful notion. This omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent Creator of all just changes God’s mind! So, where, then, are we supposed to put our faith? In what are we to believe?
In Moses’ first speech (vv. 12-13), the verb translated “know” is used three times. Moses wants certitude. He wants to know about the future and the way that God intends on being present for Israel. Israel is, in effect, having a “crisis of presence.” They need a sort of guarantee. So, are you with me or not?
In the second speech (vv. 15-16), Moses’ response seems more insistent, as though he had not been satisfied before. Without the evidence of continued presence, Israel will appear to be abandoned. Essentially, Moses wants more from God than what he has gotten. He wants absolute and unequivocal assurance that God is there. I suppose we all want that on some level.
YHWH responds again and seems to give over to Moses all that has been asked. He assures Moses that he has “found favor”. YHWH is fully committed to Moses and the future of Israel. The old promise is still intact, even after the calf episode! The amazing response of God is at the heart of faith. Because God continues in fidelity, Israel must continue in obedience. The final verses depict that Moses does get to see God—but not God’s face. The seeing is “dimly”; the knowing is “in part”, but it is enough.
Now remember in last week’s passage, we are told that God “changed his mind” in response to Moses’ insistent pleading. Moses tries his hand at the same thing this time, probably pushing his luck a bit. But God does not fully fill the request of Moses’ to see God. Instead, Moses is allowed to see only the back of God because seeing God would mean the end of one’s life. The point is that God does choose to abide with humanity and to be in relationship with humanity. But God is still God. God is not our buddy. God is not our chum. God is God. We are not meant to fully understand God. We are not meant to see all that there is to God. Perhaps we can only handle the backside of God’s glory. The rest is, I guess, left up to faith. But what we come to know of God’s presence is enough. But, then again, maybe it’s meant to NOT be enough. Maybe that’s why we keep longing and searching for oneness with God. And maybe that’s the way it’s supposed to be. After all, what good, really, is a God that we’ve completely figured out? What faith do we need for that?
And God is described here as one who will be made known not by “seeing” (the usual revelation, I suppose) but in proclamation, in the proclaiming of God’s name. Hearing the Word of God, then, IS the revelation. So, what does that say about how real we are? God is not dependent upon what God looks like. God’s Presence is made known by hearing the Word of God; hence the language of God—Word, speaking Creation into being, and proclaiming truth and justice. How comfortable are we, then, with the true revelation of God? Or are we staring blindly into the abyss as God backside stares back at us? True meaning comes from hearing and listening and witnessing to the Good News and then being quiet enough to hear the Word again.
a.What is your response to this passage? b.In what ways do we demand to see or know of God’s presence? c.What does that say about our faith? d.Is the God’s Presence that we know enough? Is it meant to be enough?
The two letters to the church at Thessalonica are powerful witnesses to the early church’s struggles with the sufferings of its members. The letters make it clear that separation from leaders, alienation from former friends and family, and ongoing threats of persecution and even death were present in the early church. Paul’s powerful thanksgiving in the first half of this reading speaks appreciatively to God about a richness and a productiveness in the lives of the Thessalonian believers. Paul’s goal for these believers was not the “good life” (i.e. material goods), but the “life that is good” (providing meaning). He cites three evidences of “the life that is good”: Responding positively to the loving initiative of God, welcoming and accepting caring leaders who cared about them, and tranformation in the lives of the believers.
As he continues, Paul begins to describe events in the more distant past. It is a way of remembering how the community came to be—receiving the “word” (of God) in spite of persecution. A meaningful life, for Paul, requires reliable resources, things that can hold and remain through time and testing. It means that even when things seem to be falling apart, God’s promises still provide us with a center that holds.
But hearing the Word of God is not an individual thing. It is in community that that Word is affirmed, interpreted, and lived out together. Otherwise, even the words themselves can become idols. Living them out in community makes them real, gives them meaning. But it is a costly meaning. Being a Christian is not meant to be easy. This early church had indeed fully committed themselves to this community and to spreading the Good News of Jesus Christ. They were open and available to wherever the Spirit would take them.
You’ll notice at the end of the passage that there is no promise of salvation in some far off future life. Rather, Paul tells this struggling community of believers that Jesus “rescues” them. The verb is present tense. In other words, just by BEING the community of faith, just by BEING the Body of Christ, just by BEING who they are called to be, the Word of God, the very Presence of God, becomes real. Jesus rescues. Jesus saves. Jesus delivers. Jesus redeems. So what are you waiting for?
a.What meaning does this passage hold for you? b.How are Paul’s words relevant today? c.What does this say about the faith community and what, as a community, it is called to be? d.What is different about recognizing Jesus’ presence and Jesus’ redemption as a present reality? What meaning does that hold? e.What sort of letter write to us? To our church? To our society?
Continuing with the questions and discussion having to do with Jesus’ authority, those against Jesus once again tried to trap him. After all, if Jesus chose God, defying Caesar, he might be arrested. But if he chose Caesar, he was not who he claimed to be. But in the same breath in which he declares that paying taxes to support secular and pagan governments is not against the will of God, Jesus goes beyond their original question, declaring that what is God’s must be given to God. The Kingdom of God embraces all of life. You cannot pit the “secular” against the “sacred”.
While the writer of Matthew is clear that loyalty to God is a different and a higher category than loyalty to Caesar, this text is not instruction on how people who live in a complex world of competing loyalties may determine what belongs to Caesar and what belongs to God. The writer leaves it to the readers to figure out what that we means. Are we called to be part of this world or the realm of God? (The answer is YES)
Governments are necessary. Taxes are necessary. But the point is that Jesus does not set the two on the same level. God always has priority. Dorothy Day said this: “If we were to render unto God all things which are God’s, there would be nothing left for Caesar.” As hard as we try, Scripture and God’s Kingdom does not acknowledge a “two kingdom” view. There is no “earthly and heavenly”, no “secular and sacred”, no “body and soul”. God is here; God is now. So if everything belongs to God, then what belongs to Caesar? That would be the point. But this is not a treatise trying to get us to ignore government or taxes either. As we said, they’re necessary. We humans cannot really function without them. The question is to whom do we belong? Whose are we? Yes, THAT is what you give to God. Yourself…(And that includes treating each other the way God calls us to treat each other which, I’m afraid, includes paying your taxes. I’m sure we are called to live responsibly and compassionately in both perceived realms of the world.)
It’s not just a matter of prioritizing; it’s a matter of BEING the Body of Christ. It doesn’t mean “giving” to God what is God’s. It means letting go of what is not ours. It means letting go of the success and the accumulation of wealth for which we have worked so hard. It means allowing God to be God and becoming the very image in which we were created. It’s hard; it’s tiring; at times it may even be somewhat dangerous. In fact, it’s probably easier to pay taxes. I think Jesus probably knew that. So, with a sort of nonchalant shrug, he left it up to us to figure it out. God doesn’t want our tax dollars. God could care less. God wants us–absolute obedience, total commitment, a complete denouncement of all other loyalties. It means that all these idols surrounding us must be broken, all these distractions must be pushed away. It means that we let God be God and, even harder, we let ourselves become the image of the one true God.
a.What meaning does this passage hold for you? b.What does that say about our political life and our faith? c.How does this change our view of the world? d.How does this change our view of our lives?
Some Quotes for Further Reflection:
My ego is like a fortress. I have built its walls stone by stone to hold out the invasion of the love of God. But I have stayed here long enough. There is light over the barriers. O my God…I let go of the past. I withdraw my grasping hand from the future. And in the great silence of this moment, I alertly rest my soul. (Howard Thurman)
In faith there is enough light for those who want to believe and enough shadows to blind those who don’t. (Blaise Pascal)
Human beings may separate things into as many piles as we wish—separating spirit from flesh, sacred from secular, church from world. But we should not be surprised when God does not recognize the distinctions we make between the two. Earth is so thick with divine possibility that it is a wonder we can walk anywhere without cracking our shins on altars. (Barbara Brown Taylor)
Closing
In order to be truthful, We must do more than speak the truth. We must also hear truth. We must also receive truth. We must also act upon truth. We must also search for truth–the difficult truth, within us and around us. We must devote ourselves to truth. Otherwise we are dishonest and our lives are mistaken. God grant us the strength and thecourage to be truthful. Amen(Michael Leunig)
Israel’s life in the wilderness, even after liberation, is precarious at best. They proceed as the Lord commanded, but there is no water. They are missing the most elemental resources for life. So they begin to complain against Moses, questioning his leadership and his effectiveness. Moses, of course, is blameless. And he reprimands Israel for not only blaming him, but also for testing God. God’s answer does not address whether or not Moses is a good leader, but addresses the problem of the people’s thirst.
Now this is not the first time that the Israelites have been thirsty. In Chapter 15, we are told that they had been in the wilderness for three days and found only water that was undrinkable. Upon complaining, they were provided with a piece of wood that, when placed in the water, made the water sweet and palatable. Then in Chapter 16, we are told the story of God providing the manna, bread from heaven, in response to the people’s fears that they would starve to death. Here, they complain again. They are once again ridden with doubts—doubts about Moses as a leader, doubts about God, and even, it seems, doubts about themselves.
The point is clear—only God can give the resources for life, but God will do so through the work of Moses. The story is told as a witness of faith in order to place God’s fidelity and attentiveness right in the middle of the human drama as it moves from hunger to fullness and thirst to water. Walter Brueggemann points out that in most advertising that we know, the “commodity” (i.e., here, the water) becomes the substitute for God and the answer to life’s problems. But is this really meant to be that way? Or is it once again a calling to open our eyes and see the things that God has already provided in our lives? Truth be told, it is easy for us to sort of dismiss these complaining Israelites. (Good grief, we think, shut up already and look around you. Don’t you see what God has done?) And yet, lest we think we are immune to such thoughts, how many times do we “doubt” God when life does not go as planned? How many times do we fail to see what God has provided simply because we’re looking for something else?
It is interesting to note that we are never actually told whether or not water came out of the rock. We are told that Moses hit the rock, but what happened? We sort of read into it that water came gushing out, alleviating all fear of thirsting to death and all questions regarding the presence of God. But, really, is that the point? After all, Moses didn’t name the place “God Provides”; he called it Massah and Meribah, derived from the words for “test” and “quarrel”. By naming the place in this way, Moses reminds all future generations of the shortcomings of the people’s faith—and of our own. In essence, the narrator turns the problem back toward the people. It becomes a story of “unfaith”. What gets in the way was not God’s response or lack thereof but, rather, the Israelites lack of trust of God. This story of “unfaith” sort of critiques that view of religion that judges God by whatever outcome the asking community received. God does not reward and punish people based on whether or not they deserve it.
Now, in Israel’s defense, this was true thirst. In this passage, I don’t think “thirst” implies a metaphorical spiritual thirst. They needed water. This story is set in the wilderness. It’s hard for us to imagine true wilderness—no resources, no direction. And the desert must be the wilderness of all wildernesses. Without trees, there is no way to gauge where you are or how far you’ve come. Any shadow or dark spot is worthy of suspicion as something of which you must be aware. And rather than the path being hard to see or hard to tread, it is continually changed by the winds and sands. And yet, wilderness is over and over again the setting through which people find their faith.
Implicit in this story is an account of egos being tripped up—both for Moses and his followers. The Israelites thought they deserved something better. They thought that if they followed God and did what they were called to do, God would reward them. They didn’t have the faith to know that God was with them. They wanted it NOW. And for Moses, he fell into the trap of thinking that he was doing everything right, that the people should just shut up and listen to him. He forgot that he was instrument of God.
The image of thirsting is profoundly human. It is a deep human need. But when our needs become more important than the source from which we came, then fears and panic set in. Alexander Baillie says that “one needs to keep on thirsting because life grows and enlarges. It has no end; it goes on and on; it becomes more beautiful…One cannot be satisfied until one…ever thirsts for God.”
This is considered one of those “murmuring” stories of the Old Testament. We do the same thing. We let our fears and our images of what “should” be get in the way. We look for someone to blame—there, our leader, the one who brought us out into this god-forsaken place or this economic downturn or this global recession. It is easier to blame someone else. And the murmuring begins, getting louder and louder as more and more of us join in, as more and more networks join in the quintessential blame game, demanding answers, demanding action. It, in fact, becomes so loud and so obnoxious that we lose all awareness that the answer is right there in front of us. Maybe it takes a wilderness, a true thirst, to finally encounter God. And maybe it takes a wilderness, a true thirst, to finally see ourselves, to finally realize what this life of faith is all about. It’s not about whether or not God answers us; it’s not about whether or not we get what want or what we think we deserve; and it’s definitely not about who’s right or who’s wrong or who’s in charge. It’s about letting the question hang on our lips long enough for us to realize that the answer was there all along—that the God who brought us here, the God who liberated us and leads us through the wilderness, is not “out there” or “up there” or in a place to which we are going. We are not trying to “get” to God. God is here. We just have to open our eyes and our minds to what that means. “Is the Lord among us or not?” And God patiently waits for the answer.
What is your response to this passage?
What do you think this tells us about God in our own lives?
What do you think Moses learned from this?
Are there ways that we may fall into “testing” God?
How often do we substitute commodities for God’s sustenance?
How, then, do you answer the question, “Is God among us or not?”
This passage contains one of the most well-known texts of the New Testament. Beginning with verse 5, the Christological Hymn, the Kenosis Hymn, from the Greek word ekenosen, meaning “to empty” begins. At its most basic, it is telling the reader to “be like Jesus”. But, more than that, it is saying “let the very mindset of Christ be yours.” It presents this mindset as a way of emptying oneself in order to be filled with God, to be the image of God.
Paul is not dismissing this as a call to not worry about one’s salvation, but, rather, to work out one’s salvation with fear and trembling, because God is at work in you. Kristin Swanson makes the claim that many of us look upon God as a giant ATM machine, dispensing what we need when we need it. But this passage is presenting not a static, dispensing God, but a God who is at work within you. This attitude, this mind of Christ means that one has knowledge of the good and understands that good as a gift of grace.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer said this: “The church is the church only when it exists for others…The church must share in the secular problems of ordinary human life, not dominating, but helping and serving…It must not underestimate the importance of human example which has its origin in the humanity of Jesus.” The hymn that we read in Philippians speaks of “the God who is at work in us, enabling us both to will and to work for his good pleasure.” To put it into more modern language, God is in our will, our desires, our fears, our thoughts, our needs, and our work. Again, God is not “out there” but is present and part of each and every aspect of our lives. No longer can we be spectators. We are part of God.
And because we are part of God, the answer to suffering in this life cannot be limited to some future glorification or “evening out” of all the horrors and abuses of this life. Rather, because God is in us, because we are part of God, because God is always at work in us, we are called to confront injustices, to bring peace, and to bring that freedom of Christ to all. This hymn is not merely about knowing Christ; it is about becoming Christ in this life. Christ came as a human to show us how to do that. Christ came as a human to show us the God who is part of us all.
In the 1950-s, Sao Kya Seng, the prince of 34 independent Shan states in northeastern Burma, also known as Hsipaw, came to Denver, Colorado, to study agriculture. Since he wanted to experience what it was like to be a student in the US, he kept his identity secret. Not even his professors knew who he really was. One of his fellow students was Inge Sargent from Austria. Both of them being exchange students, Inge and the Burmese prince quickly found that they had a lot in common and started to spend more and more time together. Their friendship grew into love but the Burmese prince decided that he would not let on his true identity even though they were seriously dating. He did not want Inge’s decision to date him to be colored by the fact that she could marry into royalty. So when he finally proposed, with an engagement ring of ruby and diamond, Inge still did not know who he really was. Inge said yes and they got married, as any other couple, in the US. For their honeymoon, Sao Kya Seng was taking Inge to his home country, so that she could meet his family and see where he was from. When their ship reached the shores of Burma, hundreds of people were waiting at the harbor. Many of them had gone out in small boat, holding up welcoming signs. A band was playing and some people were tossing flowers at the ship. Surprised at all this excitement Inge turns to her husband, and asks whose arrival they are celebrating. “Inge,” he says, I am the prince of Hsipaw. These people are celebrating our arrival. You are now the princess.” (From Twilight over Burma: My Life As a Shan Princess, by Inge Sargent., in “God Incognito”, a sermon by Sigurd Grindheim, available at http://www.sigurdgrindheim.com/sermons/incognito.html, accessed 20 September, 2011)
This passage begins a section when Jesus enters the Temple. The first part deals with the challenge of Jesus’ authority and then continues with a parable of the two sons. This is the last time that Jesus enters the Temple. After this, the high priests and elders begin to plot his death. This text puts John and Jesus in the same category—those who reject John also reject Jesus. Both are from God, yet are very different. Their differences include religious styles as well as the fact that John wavered and wondered, while Jesus spoke with unrelenting authority. When Jesus asks “What do you think?” as he begins the parable, he does not allow the silence to stand. Those who had tried to trap Jesus end up being condemned. They were the ones that were not willing to allow change into their existence. They were the ones that were not willing to be changed by God. They were so focused on protecting God that they missed hearing God. It is a matter of words and actions, profession and practice.
The parable that Jesus tells sets up a comparison between two sons–one who says he will do what his father asks, but doesn’t, with one who says he won’t, but does. For every individual who hears this parable the comparison compels them to ask the question, Which am I? Am I the son who presents himself as obedient while running around raising havoc, or am I the daughter who to all appearances is the “black sheep” but in the end does what is needed? Which am I? Which are you? There is an accusation in the parable — some who claim to obey God and observe the requirements of the Law fail, in actuality, to do so. There is also (again) a reversal of expectations in the parable — those who are seen as the antithesis of the “good” believer, some who have failed to live in the right way, will be given entry to the kingdom of heaven first.
After telling the parable, Jesus returns to John. You know, John was sent to you, you leaders, you knowledgeable ones, you believers. But, interestingly enough, it was not you who accepted him. It was the tax collectors and the prostitutes and those in the bowels of your great society, those to whom you would never even pay attention that heard John’s message. What is that about? Why is that? Perhaps it was because you were so sure that you had the answer that you quit searching for it. Perhaps it was because you were so sure that you were right that you quit asking the questions. Is that really where you want to be?
If we take this passage as merely an indictment against the Pharisees, the chief priests and elders, if you will, I think we have probably missed the point. The same danger is there for us. We believers, we learned Bible-followers (even those of us who sometimes may dare to push orthodoxy to the edge!) always and forever run the risk of assuming that we have it figured out, that we know the right way, that we know what God wants (or who God wants!). And the fact that each of us is reading this passage and asking, “Which am I”, probably does not bode well for our understanding of it. Are we the faithful one or the unfaithful one? Does it really matter? They both lied. The only difference is that one of them came around. We know that’s the hero. But lest we get too comfortable with this scenario, faith and commitment are not just a one-time thing. As Elisabeth Elliot says, “the problem with living sacrifices is that they keep creeping off the altar.”
I think God wants us to ask questions. I think God wants us to keep searching. Most of all, I think God wants us to be open to the notion that the Truth of God is not limited to the pulpit or the teacher. It is not gleaned only from the Bible scholar or the righteous one. It is not fully represented by the one who sits in their assigned pew every Sunday morning and places the appropriate amount of offering in the collection plate. Sometimes the Truth that is God is found in the dusty nooks and crannies of the world, in those places that are not acceptable or desirable or sanitized. Sometimes God shows up in the most God-forsaken places imaginable like dirty gutters and dusty roads, like battlefields and pastures of starving children in the Horn of Africa, and, oh yeah, like a dirty trough in a grotto filled with animal waste or a place of execution on a hillside outside of Jerusalem. (You know, God shows up in the most bizarre places!) So, for those of us who think we know where and how to look for God, perhaps this is our calling to be open to the possibility that God is simply waiting for us to open our eyes and believe in what we see. The vineyard is waiting for us to get to work. Any more questions?
We would rather direct this parable to others. Lord knows we can point fingers. There are the right-wing Christians, the TV evangelists with the success gospels, the megachurches with their thousands. But this parable is addressed to us.
The world turns away from our wordy gospel. What stops those outside of the church in their tracks are those who have learned to move beyond the words. It isn’t only the Gandhis and the Rosa Parkses and the Mother Teresas who remind us all over again what faith and commitment are all about. It’s those medical practitioners in Doctors Without Borders who travel on their own time and expense to work in out- of-the-way places like Niger. They’re told that the people they treat are too far gone, that they will soon die from malnutrition. This doesn’t stop them — they do what they can do.
In every church I have served I still remember a few particular names and faces. Sometimes these are people who could not pray in public and were not comfortable teaching Sunday school. Some would not even serve on committees. Some had little formal education. But they were the ones with a casserole, the ones writing me a note when I needed it the most, the ones taking folks who didn’t own cars to the grocery store, and the ones whispering as they took my hand at the back door, “I pray for you every day.” Some living sacrifices do not slip off the altar.
My son sent me a bulletin from the Maranatha Baptist Church in Plains, Georgia. One Sunday he stood in a long line of visitors to listen to Jimmy Carter teach Sunday school. He stayed for the worship service and sent me the program for the day. My eye stopped at this notice in the bulletin: Rosalynn Carter will clean the church next Saturday. Jimmy Carter will cut the grass and trim the shrubbery.
It’s not always the one who talks or preaches or teaches who reflects the will of the Father. Sometimes it is the one who shows up on a hot Saturday afternoon to dust the pews, take out the trash, cut the grass — making the world a little better for Christ’s sake. (Excerpt from “Showing Up”, a sermon by Roger Lovette, available at http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=3253, accessed 20 September, 2011.)
What meaning does this passage hold for you?
Do you see any part of your own life in this parable?
Where do you find yourself?
How does this fit in with our time today?
What is most bothersome about this passage for you?
Some Quotes for Further Reflection:
You and I are incomplete. I’m unfinished. I’m unfixed. And the reality is that’s where God meets me is in the mess of my life, in the unfixedness, in the brokenness. I thought he did the opposite, he got rid of all that stuff. But if you read the Bible, if you look at it at all, constantly he was showing up in people’s lives at the worst possible time of their life. (Mike Yaconelli)
Our God is the One who comes to us in a burning bush, in an angel’s song, in a newborn child. Our God is the One who cannot be found locked in the church, not even in the sanctuary. Our God will be where God will be with no constraints, no predictability. Our God lives where our God lives, and destruction has no power and even death cannot stop the living. Our God will be born where God will be born, but there is no place to look for the One who comes to us. When God is ready God will come even to a godforsaken place like a stable in Bethlehem. Watch…for you know not when God comes. Watch, that you might be found whenever, wherever God comes. (Ann Weems)
Judge a [person] by his questions rather than by his answers. (Voltaire (born Francois-Marie Arouet), 18th century)
Closing
Listen, dear friends, to God’s truth, bend your ears to what I tell you.
I’m chewing on the morsel of a proverb; I’ll let you in on the sweet old truths,
Stories we heard from our fathers, counsel we learned at our mother’s knee.
We’re not keeping this to ourselves, we’re passing it along to the next generation—
God’s fame and fortune, the marvelous things he has done.
He performed miracles in plain sight of their parents in Egypt, out on the fields of Zion.
He split the Sea and they walked right through it;
He piled the waters to the right and the left.
He led them by day with a cloud, led them all the night long with a fiery torch.
He split rocks in the wilderness, gave them all they could drink from underground springs; He made creeks flow out from sheer rock and water pour out like a river.
Listen, dear friends, to God’s truth, bend your ears to what I tell you…the marvelous things he has done. Amen.
(Psalm 78: 1-4, 12-16 (and then 1,4b repeated) in The Message / Remix, by Eugene Peterson, p. 998-999.)